Economies of Scope in Network-Structured Production Systems
Abstract
Methods for determining economies of scope in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) have been widely developed to investigate and examine the effects of product or service diversification on production costs. However, these techniques are not sufficiently efficient for analyzing economies of scope in systems with network structures, including network-structured production systems. The major reason for this inefficiency is the neglect of the internal structure of production units and the disregard of their intermediate products. Therefore, in this paper, while introducing the concept of economies of scope and reviewing the conventional DEA-based models for its calculation, a new method is proposed which, by taking into account the internal structure of units, is capable of evaluating the performance of virtual diversified firms formed through the integration of specialized firms with network structures. One of the important features of the proposed method is that it creates an opportunity for cooperation between the analyst and the decision-maker (manager). This cooperation facilitates the adoption of appropriate decisions aimed at reducing production costs, such as the merger of specialized firms for the joint production of products and services, or the elimination of a product from the production cycle in order to specialize the production process. By considering intermediate products, the proposed approach performs more accurately in comparison with conventional DEA methods, and planning based on it is consequently more reliable. The inefficiency of traditional DEA approaches regarding this concept is demonstrated through a numerical example in comparison with the proposed method.
Keywords:
Data envelopment analysis, Network-structured production systems, Intermediate products, Economies of scopeReferences
- [1] Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1977). Economies of scale in multi-output production. The quarterly journal of economics, 91(3), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885979
- [2] Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1981). Economies of scope. The American economic review, 71(2), 268–272. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1815729
- [3] Baunol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industrial structure. Ilarcourt, brace, jovanovlch, new york, 91(6), 1055–1066.
- [4] Färe, R. (1986). Addition and Efficiency. The quarterly journalof economics, 101(4), 861–865. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884181
- [5] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- [6] Cook, W. D., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2001). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Springer. https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=31876051438
- [7] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1979). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European journal of operational research, 3(4), 1–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- [8] Kuosmanen, T., & Johnson, A. (2017). Modeling joint production of multiple outputs in StoNED: Directional distance function approach. European journal of operational research, 262(2), 792–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.014
- [9] Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European journal of operational research, 185(1), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041
- [10] Kao, C. (2014). Network data envelopment analysis: A review. European journal of operational research, 239(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.039
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Operations Research and Artificial Intelligence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.